From REDD+ projects to ‘jurisdictional REDD+’: more bad news for the climate and communities

Published by: Open Development Mekong

For many people, REDD+ is about projects that save forests. In reality, however, REDD+ has never been about protecting forests and also no longer really is about projects but about programmes covering whole regions or provinces within a country. Though many REDD+ projects continue to exist, causing harm to indigenous peoples and forest communities by restricting their traditional forest use practises

Data Resources (1)

HTML

Download

From REDD+ projects to ‘jurisdictional REDD+’: more bad news for the climate and communities

Additional Info

Field	Value
Document type	Analysis, discussion papers, and blogs
Language of document	English
Topics	Deforestation drivers Ecological services Foreign investors Forest policy and administration Forest trade and finance
Geographic area (spatial range)	Brunei Darussalam Cambodia China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Timor-Leste Hong Kong India Indonesia Japan Korea (Democratic People's Republic of) Korea, Republic of Lao People's Democratic Republic Malaysia Mongolia Myanmar Philippines Singapore Sri Lanka Thailand Viet Nam
Copyright	To be determined
Access and use constraints	No access or usage constraints specified
Version / Edition	2017
License	unspecified
Contact	World Rainforest Movement Avenida General María Paz 1615, office 3, 11400 Montevideo, Uruguay Phone / Fax: +598 2605 6943 / E-mail: wrm@wrm.org.uy
Author (individual)	Jutta Kill
Author (corporate)	World Rainforest Movement
Publication date	2017
Keywords	REDD+,jurisdicational REDD,UN Paris Agreement
Date uploaded	August 11, 2018, 06:12 (UTC)
Date modified	August 13, 2018, 08:50 (UTC)