From REDD+ projects to ‘jurisdictional REDD+’: more bad news for the climate and communities

For many people, REDD+ is about projects that save forests. In reality, however, REDD+ has never been about protecting forests and also no longer really is about projects but about programmes covering whole regions or provinces within a country. Though many REDD+ projects continue to exist, causing harm to indigenous peoples and forest communities by restricting their traditional forest use practises

Data Resources (1)

Additional Info

Field Value
Document type Analysis, discussion papers, and blogs
Language of document
  • English
Topics
  • Deforestation drivers
  • Ecological services
  • Foreign investors
  • Forest policy and administration
  • Forest trade and finance
Geographic area (spatial range)
  • Brunei Darussalam
  • Cambodia
  • China
  • Christmas Island
  • Cocos (Keeling) Islands
  • Timor-Leste
  • Hong Kong
  • India
  • Indonesia
  • Japan
  • Korea (Democratic People's Republic of)
  • Korea, Republic of
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • Malaysia
  • Mongolia
  • Myanmar
  • Philippines
  • Singapore
  • Sri Lanka
  • Thailand
  • Viet Nam
Copyright To be determined
Access and use constraints

No access or usage constraints specified

Version / Edition 2017
Date uploaded 2018-08-11T06:03:07.420114
Date modified 2018-08-11T06:03:07.432241
Contact

World Rainforest Movement Avenida General María Paz 1615, office 3, 11400 Montevideo, Uruguay Phone / Fax: +598 2605 6943 / E-mail: wrm@wrm.org.uy

Author (individual) Jutta Kill
Author (corporate) World Rainforest Movement
Publication date 2017
Keywords REDD+,jurisdicational REDD,UN Paris Agreement